Disability News Service, Resources, Diversity, Americans with Disabilities Act; Local and National.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Illinois facing 'severe cash shortage', Ignores Court Ordered payments to 10,000 residents with developmental disabilities

Facing a “severe cash shortage,” Illinois is unable to pay social service agencies what they’re owed by the state — despite a recent court order compelling it to do so.

Illinois Comptroller Leslie Munger’s office, which is charged with paying the state’s bills, said Monday that it could not find the funds to immediately comply with a federal judge’s order that the state make payments to more than 10,000 residents with developmental disabilities.

article by NATASHA KORECK | Chicago Sun Times | Aug 24, 2015


“The cash flow right now is very low,” spokesman Rich Carter told the Chicago Sun-Times. “We just don’t have the money. We’re extremely concerned about that.”
Advocacy groups went to court arguing the state’s failure to make payments to agencies providing services to those with disabilities put providers at risk of closure. Closure could displace thousands of people with profound developmental disabilities.
Citing a recent legislative analysis, Carter said the state is on pace to run a deficit of $5 billion. He said the office is prioritizing payments for nonprofits.
“Right now the severe cash shortages created by the budget impasse are preventing us from making those payments. We are extremely concerned about our non-profits,” he said. “Bottom line: Because of the combination of the continuing appropriations we have to pay, along with the court orders, along with the loss of the income tax revenue, we’re facing significant cash shortages right now. That will continue until we have a budget agreement.”
The state had not made a payment to the providers since the new fiscal year started July 1.

U.S. District Judge Sharon Coleman ordered the Comptroller’s office to pay the first installment by Friday.

That hasn’t happened, according to Barry Taylor of Equip for Equality, who is representing plaintiffs in the case involving developmentally disabled residents.
“We believe the fact that they haven’t paid is a violation of … the court order,” Taylor said Monday. “We’re evaluating our legal options. We haven’t received any official explanation from the state as to why they’re not complying with the order.”
Carter said he does not believe the office is violating the order.

Coleman’s order is just one example of how Illinois is paying its bills – by court mandate — since Illinois lawmakers and Gov. Bruce Rauner were unable to reach a budget agreement. Rauner vetoed a Democrat-authored financial plan in June, saying it was out of balance by some $4 billion. The new fiscal year came and went July 1 without a new plan in place. Both sides say they’re willing to negotiate, but remain locked into their positions. Rauner wants a series of changes to benefit businesses and weaken unions in Illinois. Democrats oppose the proposals and say they shouldn’t be attached to a budget.

A recent analysis by Senate Democrats indicates that because of various contracts, decrees and court orders compelling spending, the state had already committed 90 percent of its revenues and was on pace to be $5 billion in the hole.

State Rep. Jack Franks, D-Marengo, often a swing vote in the Democrat-controlled Illinois House, called for Rauner on Monday order a special session — and not allow lawmakers to go home until a balanced budget is passed.

“We’ve allowed the courts to take over for the General Assembly,” Franks said. “We’ve been sidetracked. We’re not keeping our eye on the ball. …We’re sitting here playing these stupid political games. … Soon our social service agencies will be closing their doors.”

Rauner has denounced the spending levels, but he remains opposed to calling a special session, citing the cost, according to his office.

“The governor is ready to negotiate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to reach an agreement that produces cost-saving reforms, a better jobs climate and a balanced budget,” spokeswoman Catherine Kelly wrote in an email. “Those negotiations don’t require a special session, which costs tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars per day, to be called. All that’s required is independent, reform-minded legislators to come to the table.”

The Illinois House is set to meet in a Committee of the Whole on Tuesday. Lawmakers say it’s unlikely the chamber will vote this week on whether to override Rauner’s veto of a bill allowing arbitration in public union negotiations.
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/7/71/903797/comptroller-illinois-facing-severe-cash-shortage

National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC

from a PRESS RELEASE | Aug 21, 2015
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Advocacy Group Terminated an Employee because He Would Not Work on the Sabbath, Federal Agency Charged
BALTIMORE - The National Federation of the Blind, the largest organization of blind and low-vision people in the United States, violated federal law when it refused to allow an employee to observe his Sabbath and instead terminated him because of his religion, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it announced today.
According to the lawsuit, Joseph R. Massey II is a practicing Hebrew Pentecostal, a Christian denomination, and abstains from working from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday based on his sincerely-held religious beliefs.  The National Federation of the Blind hired Massey for a bookkeeping position at its Baltimore office in November 2013.  In January 2014, the Federation told Massey he had to work certain Saturdays.  Massey explained he could not work Saturdays due to his religious faith and suggested alternatives such as working on Sundays or working late on week nights other than Fridays.  EEOC charged that the Federation refused to provide any reasonable accommodation and instead fired Massey because he could not work Saturdays due to his religious beliefs.   
Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion and requires employers to reasonably accommodate an employee's sincerely-held religious beliefs unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the employer.  EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. The National Federation of the Blind, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-02484-GLR) in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.  
"Employees should not have to choose between their jobs and their religious convictions when a religious accommodation will not unduly burden others," said EEOC Philadelphia District Director Spencer H. Lewis, Jr. 
EEOC Regional Attorney Debra M. Lawrence added, "Most religious accommodations are not unduly costly, such as allowing an employee to switch his schedule to observe his Sabbath.  No employee should be forced to choose between earning a living and following the dictates of his faith."  
EEOC's Philadelphia District Office has jurisdiction over Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia and parts of New Jersey and Ohio.  Its legal staff also prosecutes discrimination cases arising from Washington, D.C. and parts of Virginia.
EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination.  Further information about the agency is available at its website, www.eeoc.gov.
http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/8-21-15c.cfm

Monday, August 24, 2015

U.S. Access Board Webinar (Sept 3rd): Open Question and Answer Session


laptop with Access Board sealThe next webinar in the Board's free monthly series will take place September 3 from 2:30 – 4:00 (ET) and will feature an open question and answer session with Board accessibility specialists. Questions are welcome on the Board's accessibility requirements and rulemaking activities, including the ADA and ABA Accessibility Standards, new standards being developed for medical diagnostic equipment, and other topics related to the Board's work. Questions can be submitted in advance of the session (total limited to 25) or can be posed during the webinar.
For more information, including registration instructions, visit www.accessibilityonline.org. Webinar attendees can earn continuing education credits (CEUs). Archived copies of previous Board webinars are also available on the site. The webinar series is made available in cooperation with the ADA National Network.

# as shared by the U.S. Access Board

2015 Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities in Illinois (CCDI) Annual Awards Recipients

as shared by Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities.


The Bank Long Jr. Markeeta Award is presented annually to an individual who has shown strong leadership skills and advocacy. For their advancement and progress as a youth in pursuit of social justice. 


Kellsey McGuire is 9 years of age and a 3rd grader as Jordan Catholic School in Rock Island.  In January of 2014 Kellsey received service dog, Jasper, to alert her parents and others of impending seizures.


Kellsey McGuire & Family with Board Member Liz SherwinWithin a month of receiving Jasper, the family was told by the Sherrard School District that Jasper could no longer attend school with Kellsey, in direct violation of the ADA. After several instances of discrimination against Kellsey and Jasper the McGuires made the decision to withdraw Kellsey from Sherrard and enrolled her at Jordan Catholic School. At Jordan, Kellsey and Jasper were both welcomed with open arms and hearts.  Jasper is even included in the 3rd grade school picture.



The family filed a discrimination complaint against the school district with IDA and the judge ruled in their favor under (2) areas: Hostile Environment and Denial of a Free and Appropriate Education.  The Sherrard School District appealed the decision and it is pending.


Friends of the McGuire’s started Justice for Jasper to raise awareness about the blatant discrimination on the part of the Sherrard School District and its board. This issue has been publicized locally and nationally.


She and her family have done a tremendous amount of work over the last several years to promote Epilepsy awareness. They, along with many friends, started ribbonsforkellsey.


The Senator Penny Severns Memorial Award (formerly Legislator of the Year). This award honors a legislator from Illinois who has shown outstanding support of issues that are important to people with disabilities. 


This year’s recipient was a Senator that has done so many things to help people with disabilities. He has sponsored many bills that help the causes of people with disabilities including SR 342 which oposes the raising of the DON score. He is a board member for the Epilepsy Foundation and recently advocated to restore funding to autism, epilepsy and early intervention.  This year’s recipient of the Senator Penny Severns Memorial Award (formerly Legislator of the Year) isSenator Dan Kotowski.


The Doctor Judy Smithson Advocacy Award. This award is presented annually to an  individual who has displayed strong leadership and advocacy skills.


This year’s recipient has shown commitment to advocacy activities supporting the human and constitutional rights of citizens with disabilities. This year’s winner is the disability rights advocate for Life Center for Independent Living in Bloomington. She is tireless in this role while advocating in the areas of housing, transportation, health care, Human Services/CIL Funding as well as attitudinal & physical barriers.  She participated in the Not Dead Yet Action in Chicago last summer. 

She teaches legislative and community advocacy skills and co-taught theAdvocacy 101 class in 2014 and by herself again this year.  She serves on the SILC/INCIL Advocacy Strategy group. She recently completed the grueling, prestigious Multi-Cultural Leadership program in McLean County.  We are thrilled that this year's recipient of the Doctor Judy Smithson Advocacy Award is Rickielee Benecke.


The Barbara Pritchard Award.  This award is given annually to an individual who has done outstanding work as an advocate behind the scenes.  This individual rarely seeks the spotlight for themselves, but instead spends a great deal of time helping others to succeed and meet their goals.


The winner of this year’s Award has been a tireless advocate for people of all disabilities, but especially those that are deaf or hard of hearing. She use to be the Deaf Services ILS at LIFE CIL. She works closely with the IL Deaf & Hard of Hearing Commission.  She is a board member for the SILC,which also presents itself with other duties, as she is on the executive committee and is a member of of the SILC’s advocacy committees.  She has been described by others she has worked with as a very hard working advocate for persons who are deaf.  She has great vision and ideas.  The winner of this year’s Barbara Pritchard Award is Dana Craig.Award recipient Dana Craig



The Justin Dart Distinguished Citizen Award is the most prestigious honor the Coalition presents.  Past recipients include Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton, Former Illinois Attorney General Jim Ryan and of course Justin Dart, Jr. himself.  This award is presented to an individual who has shown an outstanding commitment to the rights of persons with disabilities.


The nominee has been an ongoing advocate for the broadest range of disability issues since…forever.  He has defended our rights at the Federal, State, and local level.  He conducts legislative training classes for those whose interest in disability rights and the political system is just awakening. 


His work with Chicago ADAPT and ADAPT clearly demonstrates his ability to motivate, organize, and successfully involve the widest elements of our community.  Known and respected throughout Illinois, other states, and Washington, DC., he has the ability to make politicians listen to our issues, acknowledge need for change, and work, often even sponsor, important legislation. 


Larry Biondi and<br />CCDI Board Member Patty Martin

Adamantly, never a disability poster child, his demeanor is that of an accomplished, educated, thoughtful and humble person (with disabilities).  He has and knows how to use his wicked sense of humor, especially double entendre - to make everyone gasp with laughter.  Most importantly, by his actions this nominee helps make everyone he contacts feel important for their abilities. 


In these and in so many other ways, Larry Biondi is the epitome of disability diplomat worthy of the Justin Dart Award. We congratulate Larry as the 2015 Justin Dart Distinguished Citizen Award recipient!

(GO LARRY, and congratulations)

Thursday, August 20, 2015

DISABILITY MENTORING DAY - career development for students and job-seekers with disabilities

as posted by The American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD).
Disability Mentoring Day (DMD)
DMD is a large-scale national effort coordinated by AAPD to promote career development for students and job-seekers with disabilities through hands-on career exploration and ongoing mentoring relationships.

When is it?
While DMD has been and continues to be officially launched the third Wednesday of each October during National Disability Employment Awareness Month (NDEAM), the foundation of the program has expanded from a one-day event to a year-round initiative across the country.

How did it begin?
DMD was founded in 1999 through a White House initiative with less than three-dozen students participating to increase the awareness of NDEAM. Since that event, DMD has springboarded from a one day event for a small group of students to an extensive national mentoring program for young professionals with disabilities across the United States, territories and abroad.

What does AAPD do?
The growth of DMD was made possible by the unwavering work of DMD Coordinators across the country who volunteer their time to host and manage the logistical requirements for a DMD. These events produce life changing results for mentees, such as full time employment and internship opportunities. AAPD continues to increase the reach of DMD through growing its network of DMD coordinators. If you or anyone you know may be interested or want additional information on becoming a DMD coordinator, please email us at DMD@aapd.com.

How do I get involved?
The first step to becoming a DMD coordinator is to submit an application, which can be found here. AAPD will then review your qualifications and notify you of the decision. Once accepted, you’ll have an abundance of resources to take advantage of to produce your first and successful DMD. Your responsibilities as a coordinator includes, but are not limited to, coordinating outreach to potential hosts and mentors for your DMD, such as businesses, corporations, government agencies, and advocacy organizations. You’ll also search for mentees from local high schools and colleges to participate in your DMD event. We’ve received countless stories from DMD coordinators on the profound difference this one day can have for young people with disabilities, including leading to their first paid internship or job.

Submit an application to become a DMD Coordinator - (Form) | (Word)

Disability Mentoring Day FAQs - (Word) | (PDF)

Best Practices for DMD Coordinators - (Word) | (PDF)

How do I become a mentor or a mentee?
AAPD has an extensive list of active DMD coordinators across the country that we can share with potential participants interested in becoming a DMD mentee or mentor as well as businesses and organizations looking to help host and/or sponsor a DMD. If interested, please email us at DMD@aapd.com.

Best Practices for Corporate Mentors - (Word) | (PDF)

How can my organization get involved with DMD?
Whether it’s through serving as a sponsor, host, and/or mentoring, corporations, local businesses, government agencies, and other organizations have been the driving force for moving the success of DMD forward. To learn more about the opportunities to have your organization get involved with DMD in a local community, please email us at DMD@aapd.com.

http://www.aapd.com/what-we-do/employment/disability-mentoring-day/

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Inspiring the Changing Face of Retail with Inclusion, Spann & Finn the Service Dog

When Walmart founder Sam Walton opened his first retail store he dreamed of offering lower prices with high quality products and offering job opportunities for community workers. Today, hundreds of Walmart workers hold similar dreams in the retail business, including Spann Cordle.
article by Montgomery J. Granger for The Blaze | May 2015
as shared by @spannservicedog 


Spann, who was diagnosed with cerebral palsy, works at Walmart first as a greeter, and now on their sales floor. While his goal is to work at their corporate headquarters as a Disability Trainer and Advocate, he has found challenges along the way.
“Every day I have an opportunity to make connections with people, shifting their perception about people with disabilities. My service dog, Finn relaxes people and gives us something to talk about,” Spann said. “But there are still challenges I face in working within the retail system. I’m sure if I’d had the opportunity to meet Sam Walton I would be in a different position today.”
“Sam Walton was a visionary, he believed in his associates and that they were the backbone of the success of the company. Mr. Walton said for us as associates to ‘exceed our expectations,’ so I feel that if Mr. Walton could see what I have done for the company, and what I intend to do, I feel sure he would’ve made a place for me in the corporate office,” he continued.
Some say that in the retail industry one’s ability to climb into roles with more responsibility is based on commission sales or sales numbers alone. For people with disabilities, where customers might not know how to approach or ask for assistance, that can be a huge challenge to overcome.
According to U.S. Census Bureau statistics released in July 2012, about 56.7 million people — 19 percent of the population, or about one out of every five Americans — had a disability in 2010, and about half of those had a severe disability. Also according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 statistics just over 9.3 million people with disabilities were employed. That’s only about 17 percent of all disabled people employed – an unemployment rate of 63 percent.
This is a staggering. Many people with disabilities aren’t encouraged to find jobs in the same way their able-body counterparts are.
While organizations such as the Association for People Supporting Employment First are challenging the way employers and hiring managers perceive employees, people with disabilities in chain retail stores are even less likely to have positions in upper management.
Gaining a position as a Walmart greeter in Spann’s hometown of Summerville, Georgia, Spann was just thankful to have a job. It was an easy job for him because he knew everyone in town, especially since he and his service dog Finn were often seen in town together. Spann’s manager, Jeremy Lightsey, encouraged him to think about his goals, and what steps he needed to take to move into a higher position.
“Jeremy is definitely a mentor,” Spann said. “He saw something in me that superseded the sales floor at Walmart. He saw my strengths and advocated to others how those strengths could be used.”
“For people with disabilities,” Spann said, “having a mentor can help them rise above some of the challenges they face.”
Spann and Finn have been working companions for over 11 years. Finn, raised in Nebraska, was trained by Canine Specialty Training in Independence, Missouri. Inspired by a television show on service animals, Spann said he raised the $5,000 fee for Finn to bypass the long waiting time at another facility.
For Spann, who lives independently, Finn is an essential aspect of his independence. Fluent in over 80 commands, the black Labrador mix can open and close doors, assist with the laundry, and retrieve items such as a cell phone. Finn also pulls Spann’s wheelchair, easing the wear and tear on Spann’s joints, a symptom of Cerebral Palsy.
“Finn can even pick up items as small as a dime and then put them in my hand,” said Spann.
The duo has become known for their teamwork and seamless collaboration. Working on the sales floor at Walmart, often Finn can be seen pulling Spann’s wheelchair throughout the aisles. If Spann drops something, Finn is there to pick it up.
Not only does Finn assist with physical tasks, but he breaks down barriers and perceptions about people with disabilities.
“Finn can break the ice with a wagging tail, and then customers are more apt to approach me, even though I’m in a wheelchair,” said Spann.
At Walmart, Spann says customers love talking about Finn, creating opportunities to get to know Spann beyond his disability.
However, Spann says he still encounters “customers who give me off looks or speak to me in a condescending way.”
“It’s easy for people to see my wheelchair and assume I have an intellectual disability as well,” he said.
His response?
Spann says he and Finn live by a simple but effective work ethic: “Do your job, don’t miss work, and don’t be late.”
Moving to Arkansas, where Walmart’s corporate headquarters is located, has fueled Spann’s dedication to the company and inspiration to be a spokesperson for people with disabilities in the retail industry.
“I know that in the end, perseverance will pay off,” Spann said. “It’s my mission to help both individuals and organizations to bring education and inspiration about how to incorporate inclusion in their lives. Every day I aspire to work with the [Americans with Disabilities Act] department at Walmart to travel and speak, representing them and sharing my story about how working at Walmart has given me a sense of fulfillment.”
Spann has become the face of inclusion at Walmart, profiled in a 2009 training manual and most recently added in a new orientation guide. He is elated to be involved in changing the way the retail industry includes people with disabilities, but there is always more work to do.
When was the last time you saw a service dog and his owner on the retail sales floor? Don’t be shy!
Catch up with Spann and Finn on their website or on Twitter @spannsworld.
I am the author of “Saving Grace at Guantanamo Bay: A Memoir of a Citizen Warrior,” and three times mobilized U.S. Army Reserve Major (Retired). Join me on Twitter @mjgranger1, Facebook and my Blog.
Photo Credits: Spann Cordlehttp://www.theblaze.com/contributions/inspiring-the-changing-face-of-retail-with-inclusion/

Illinois To Finally Pay For Services For Thousands Of People With Developmental Disabilities, Federal Judge Orders Specific Schedule

Court order resolves dispute, sets short deadline for making July payments

CHICAGO, Aug. 19, 2015 -- The State of Illinois must begin paying for services that support persons with developmental disabilities by the end of this week, a federal court said in a ruling on Tuesday. Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman issued an Order late yesterday clarifying previous confusion in this area, and requiring the State of Illinois to make payments for over 10,000 Illinois residents with developmental disabilities who are part of the Consent Decree in Ligas v. Norwood. The State has made no payments for Ligas class members or other beneficiaries of the Consent Decree since July 1, when the new fiscal year began. The legislature and Governor Bruce Rauner have been unable to agree on a budget.

As a result of the State's failure to make payments, developmental disability service providers were at risk of closing, and thousands of people with developmental disabilities were in danger of losing their homes and being forced to move into unfamiliar and inappropriate settings.

In late June, the Illinois Comptroller took the position that because of the budget impasse, she could not make payments under the Ligas Consent Decree without a court order. Accordingly, Judge Coleman entered an Order on June 30 requiring the Comptroller to continue making all payments under the Consent Decree at a level no less than paid in the previous fiscal year.

The State incorrectly interpreted the June 30 Order to apply only to Ligas class members, despite the clear rights of other people with developmental disabilities under the Consent Decree. Accordingly, attorneys for the Plaintiffs and the Intervenors filed a joint motion requesting that the Judge issue an Order confirming that class members and beneficiaries of the Decree were entitled to payment, and seeking a date certain for when payments would be made. After the motion was filed, the State agreed to make payment for class members and beneficiaries, but would not provide a date certain for payment. Thursday's Order provides that certainty for people with developmental disabilities and their service providers. Under Judge Coleman's Order, the State is required to make payment for all July services by August 21. For August services submitted by August 18, the State is required to pay all claims by September 4. BySeptember 18, the State must be in total compliance with the Consent Decree.
"The State's misreading of the Judge's previous order created unnecessary concern for service providers and our clients," said Barry C. Taylor, VP for Civil Rights and Systemic Litigation at Equip for Equality, and lead counsel for the Plaintiffs. "It became necessary to ask the Judge to make this clarification to prevent significant harm to our clients. We are pleased that the court acted so quickly and ordered a specific payment schedule that takes effect this week."
The Plaintiffs are represented by Barry C. Taylor and Laura J. Miller at Equip for Equality, Benjamin S. Wolf at the ACLU of Illinois, and John Grossbart at Dentons LLP, on a pro bono basis. Intervenors are represented by Scott M. Mendel at K&L Gates LLP and William Choslovsky at Fox Rothschild LLP.

Judge Coleman's Order can be found at:
www.equipforequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Ligas-Order-to-Enforce-Consent-Decree.pdf

Questions for Plaintiffs' Counsel may be directed to Barry C. Taylor, Equip for Equality at 312-895-7317 (work) or 773-562-9567 (cell).

SOURCE - Press Release 08/19/2015 | Equip for Equality

ALERT - Attack on Illinois TANF, SNAP, Medicaid Right to Appeal - PUBLIC HEARINGS AUG 25 & 26, 2015

as shared from our colleagues at Access Living (CIL) in Chicago. 

Dear Access Living friends and allies,
 
We are facing a serious threat to the rights of people with disabilities and others who rely on TANF, SNAP and Medicaid (including home services). As we know, people are often terminated or denied those benefits for various reasons, and it can be pretty hard to appeal those decisions, especially on your own. The State of Illinois is proposing to make the appeals process even harder. There will be public hearings on the proposed rules in Springfield on August 25 and Chicago on August 26. People should seriously consider attending the hearings to express concern.
 
The proposed rules (which you can access at this link, see page 7301) do not provide customers with due process, are unnecessarily complicated and confusing, and in some cases are in conflict with the federal statutes and regulations protecting the rights of those eligible for the various benefits programs. For example:
  • The proposed rules don't require adequate notices about agency actions
  • They have different appeal deadlines for different programs
  • They do not assure customers' access to their records for appeals
  • They require appellants to pinpoint why the agency action appealed is wrong rather than requiring the agency to establish that its action is right
  • They change the locations where hearings will be held to places where customers cannot attend (long term medical assistance cases are assigned to Chicago or Decatur)
In sum, under the proposed rules eligible people will be denied benefits and terminated from benefits causing severe harm. Many organizations that serve people with TANF, SNAP and Medicaid are working to provide public comment to the State on this issue, including Access Living.   Many thanks to the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law for alerting us to this problem. For those who wish to attend the public hearings, the information is as follows:
Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:00 a.m. – 12:00p.m.
Michael J. Howlett Building
2nd & Edwards Streets
Springfield IL
 
Wednesday, August 26, 2015 1:00 p.m. – 3:00p.m
Michael A. Bilandic Bldg.
Auditorium Room C-500, 5th Floor
160 N. LaSalle
Chicago IL
 
The State also provided the following guidance for the hearings and written comment:
 
The hearings will be held for the sole purpose of gathering public comments on the proposed amendments. Persons interested in presenting testimony at this hearing are advised that the Illinois Department of Human Services will adhere to the following procedures in the conduct of the hearing:
a) No oral testimony shall exceed an aggregate of ten (10) minutes.
b) Each person presenting oral testimony shall provide to the hearing officer a written (preferably typed) copy of such testimony at the time the oral testimony is presented. No oral testimony will be accepted without a written copy of the testimony being provided.
c) No person will be recognized to speak for a second time until all persons wishing to testify have done so.
d) In order to provide for a balanced presentation of views and to facilitate the orderly conduct of the hearing, the hearing officer may impose such other rules of procedures, including the order of call of witnesses, as she/he deems necessary.
e) Persons requiring reasonable accommodation due to disability must contact the
Bureau of Administrative Rules and Procedures by August 10, 2015.
f) Name and address of Agency Contact Person: Questions regarding the public hearings shall be directed to:
ILLINOIS REGISTER 10657
15 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Ms. Tracie Drew, Bureau Chief
Bureau of Administrative Rules and Procedures
Department of Human Services
100 South Grand Avenue East
3rd Floor, Harris Building
Springfield IL 62762
217/785-9772
 
We at Access Living urge you to let the State of Illinois know that changing the rules on people who have TANF, SNAP and Medicaid is basically an attack on the people who are the least likely to have resources to fight back.
 
Let’s go Illinois!
 
Amber Smock
Director of Advocacy, Access Living

The ADA: Your Employment Rights as an Individual With a Disability

as posted by The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

The ADA: Your Employment Rights as an Individual With a Disability

Notice Concerning The Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act Of 2008

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of 2008 was signed into law on September 25, 2008 and becomes effective January 1, 2009. Because this law makes several significant changes, including changes to the definition of the term "disability," the EEOC will be evaluating the impact of these changes on this document and other publications. See the list of specific changes to the ADA made by the ADA Amendments Act.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) makes it unlawful to discriminate in employment against a qualified individual with a disability. The ADA also outlaws discrimination against individuals with disabilities in State and local government services, public accommodations, transportation and telecommunications. This booklet explains the part of the ADA that prohibits job discrimination. This part of the law is enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and State and local civil rights enforcement agencies that work with the Commission.

What Employers Are Covered by the ADA?

Job discrimination against people with disabilities is illegal if practiced by:
  • private employers,
  • state and local governments,
  • employment agencies,
  • labor organizations,
  • and labor-management committees.
The part of the ADA enforced by the EEOC outlaws job discrimination by:
  • all employers, including State and local government employers, with 25 or more employees after July 26, 1992, and
  • all employers, including State and local government employers, with 15 or more employees after July 26, 1994.
Another part of the ADA, enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice, prohibits discrimination in State and local government programs and activities, including discrimination by all State and local governments, regardless of the number of employees, after January 26, 1992.
Because the ADA establishes overlapping responsibilities in both EEOC and DOJ for employment by State and local governments, the Federal enforcement effort is coordinated by EEOC and DOJ to avoid duplication in investigative and enforcement activities. In addition, since some private and governmental employers are already covered by nondiscrimination and affirmative action requirements under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, EEOC, DOJ, and the Department of Labor similarly coordinate the enforcement effort under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act.

Are You Protected by The ADA?

If you have a disability and are qualified to do a job, the ADA protects you from job discrimination on the basis of your disability. Under the ADA, you have a disability if you have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. The ADA also protects you if you have a history of such a disability, or if an employer believes that you have such a disability, even if you don't.
To be protected under the ADA, you must have, have a record of, or be regarded as having a substantial, as opposed to a minor, impairment. A substantial impairment is one that significantly limits or restricts a major life activity such as hearing, seeing, speaking, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, caring for oneself, learning or working.
If you have a disability, you must also be qualified to perform the essential functions or duties of a job, with or without reasonable accommodation, in order to be protected from job discrimination by the ADA. This means two things. First, you must satisfy the employer's requirements for the job, such as education, employment experience, skills or licenses. Second, you must be able to perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation. Essential functions are the fundamental job duties that you must be able to perform on your own or with the help of a reasonable accommodation. An employer cannot refuse to hire you because your disability prevents you from performing duties that are not essential to the job.

What is Reasonable Accommodation?

Reasonable accommodation is any change or adjustment to a job or work environment that permits a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to participate in the job application process, to perform the essential functions of a job, or to enjoy benefits and privileges of employment equal to those enjoyed by employees without disabilities. For example, reasonable accommodation may include:
  • providing or modifying equipment or devices,
  • job restructuring,
  • part-time or modified work schedules,
  • reassignment to a vacant position,
  • adjusting or modifying examinations, training materials, or policies,
  • providing readers and interpreters, and
  • making the workplace readily accessible to and usable by people with disabilities.
An employer is required to provide a reasonable accommodation to a qualified applicant or employee with a disability unless the employer can show that the accommodation would be an undue hardship -- that is, that it would require significant difficulty or expense.

What Employment Practices are Covered?

The ADA makes it unlawful to discriminate in all employment
  • practices such as:
  • recruitment
  • firing
  • hiring
  • training
  • job assignments
  • promotions
  • pay
  • benefits
  • lay off
  • leave
  • all other employment related activities.
It is also unlawful for an employer to retaliate against you for asserting your rights under the ADA. The Act also protects you if you are a victim of discrimination because of your family, business, social or other relationship or association with an individual with a disability.

Can an Employer Require Medical Examinations or Ask Questions About a Disability?

If you are applying for a job, an employer cannot ask you if you are disabled or ask about the nature or severity of your disability. An employer can ask if you can perform the duties of the job with or without reasonable accommodation. An employer can also ask you to describe or to demonstrate how, with or without reasonable accommodation, you will perform the duties of the job.
An employer cannot require you to take a medical examination before you are offered a job. Following a job offer, an employer can condition the offer on your passing a required medical examination, but only if all entering employees for that job category have to take the examination. However, an employer cannot reject you because of information about your disability revealed by the medical examination, unless the reasons for rejection are job-related and necessary for the conduct of the employer's business. The employer cannot refuse to hire you because of your disability if you can perform the essential functions of the job with an accommodation.
Once you have been hired and started work, your employer cannot require that you take a medical examination or ask questions about your disability unless they are related to your job and necessary for the conduct of your employer's business. Your employer may conduct voluntary medical examinations that are part of an employee health program, and may provide medical information required by State workers' compensation laws to the agencies that administer such laws.
The results of all medical examinations must be kept confidential, and maintained in separate medical files.

Do Individuals Who Use Drugs Illegally Have Rights Under the ADA?

Anyone who is currently using drugs illegally is not protected by the ADA and may be denied employment or fired on the basis of such use. The ADA does not prevent employers from testing applicants or employees for current illegal drug use.

What Do I Do If I Think That I'm Being Discriminated Against?

If you think you have been discriminated against in employment on the basis of disability after July 26, 1992, you should contact the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A charge of discrimination generally must be filed within 180 days of the alleged discrimination. You may have up to 300 days to file a charge if there is a State or local law that provides relief for discrimination on the basis of disability. However, to protect your rights, it is best to contact EEOC promptly if discrimination is suspected.
You may file a charge of discrimination on the basis of disability by contacting any EEOC field office, located in cities throughout the United States. If you have been discriminated against, you are entitled to a remedy that will place you in the position you would have been in if the discrimination had never occurred. You may be entitled to hiring, promotion, reinstatement, back pay, or reasonable accommodation, including reassignment. You may also be entitled to attorneys fees.
While the EEOC can only process ADA charges based on actions occurring on or after July 26, 1992, you may already be protected by State or local laws or by other current federal laws. EEOC field offices can refer you to the agencies that enforce those laws.
To contact the EEOC, look in your telephone directory under "U.S. Government." For information and instructions on reaching your local office, call:
  • (800) 669-4000 (Voice)
  • (800) 669-6820 (TDD)
  • (In the Washington, D.C. 202 Area Code, call 202-663-4900 (voice) or 202-663-4494 (TDD).)

Can I Get Additional ADA Information and Assistance?

The EEOC conducts an active technical assistance program to promote voluntary compliance with the ADA. This program is designed to help people with disabilities understand their rights and to help employers understand their responsibilities under the law.
In January 1992, EEOC published a Technical Assistance Manual, providing practical application of legal requirements to specific employment activities, with a directory of resources to aid compliance. EEOC publishes other educational materials, provides training on the law for people with disabilities and for employers, and participates in meetings and training programs of other organizations. EEOC staff also will respond to individual requests for information and assistance. The Commission's technical assistance program is separate and distinct from its enforcement responsibilities. Employers who seek information or assistance from the Commission will not be subject to any enforcement action because of such inquiries.
The Commission also recognizes that differences and disputes about ADA requirements may arise between employers and people with disabilities as a result of misunderstandings. Such disputes frequently can be resolved more effectively through informal negotiation or mediation procedures, rather than through the formal enforcement process of the ADA. Accordingly,EEOC will encourage efforts of employers and individuals with disabilities to settle such differences through alternative methods of dispute resolution, providing that such efforts do not deprive any individual of legal rights provided by the statute.

More Questions and Answers About the ADA

Q. Is an employer required to provide reasonable accommodation when I apply for a job?
A. Yes. Applicants, as well as employees, are entitled to reasonable accommodation. For example, an employer may be required to provide a sign language interpreter during a job interview for an applicant who is deaf or hearing impaired, unless to do so would impose an undue hardship.
Q. Should I tell my employer that I have a disability?
A. If you think you will need a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the application process or to perform essential job functions, you should inform the employer that an accommodation will be needed. Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodation only for the physical or mental limitations of a qualified individual with a disability of which they are aware. Generally, it is the responsibility of the employee to inform the employer that an accommodation is needed.
Q. Do I have to pay for a needed reasonable accommodation?
A. No. The ADA requires that the employer provide the accommodation unless to do so would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer's business. If the cost of providing the needed accommodation would be an undue hardship, the employee must be given the choice of providing the accommodation or paying for the portion of the accommodation that causes the undue hardship.
Q. Can an employer lower my salary or pay me less than other employees doing the same job because I need a reasonable accommodation?
A. No. An employer cannot make up the cost of providing a reasonable accommodation by lowering your salary or paying you less than other employees in similar positions.
Q. Does an employer have to make non-work areas used by employees, such as cafeterias, lounges, or employer-provided transportation accessible to people with disabilities?
A. Yes. The requirement to provide reasonable accommodation covers all services, programs, and non-work facilities provided by the employer. If making an existing facility accessible would be an undue hardship, the employer must provide a comparable facility that will enable a person with a disability to enjoy benefits and privileges of employment similar to those enjoyed by other employees, unless to do so would be an undue hardship.
Q. If an employer has several qualified applicants for a job, is the employer required to select a qualified applicant with a disability over other applicants without a disability?
A. No. The ADA does not require that an employer hire an applicant with a disability over other applicants because the person has a disability. The ADA only prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. It makes it unlawful to refuse to hire a qualified applicant with a disability because he is disabled or because a reasonable accommodation is required to make it possible for this person to perform essential job functions.
Q. Can an employer refuse to hire me because he believes that it would be unsafe, because of my disability, for me to work with certain machinery required to perform the essential functions of the job?
A. The ADA permits an employer to refuse to hire an individual if she poses a direct threat to the health or safety of herself or others. A direct threat means a significant risk of substantial harm. The determination that there is a direct threat must be based on objective, factual evidence regarding an individual's present ability to perform essential functions of a job. An employer cannot refuse to hire you because of a slightly increased risk or because of fears that there might be a significant risk sometime in the future. The employer must also consider whether a risk can be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level with a reasonable accommodation.
Q. Can an employer offer a health insurance policy that excludes coverage for pre-existing conditions?
A. Yes. The ADA does not affect pre-existing condition clauses contained in health insurance policies even though such clauses may adversely affect employees with disabilities more than other employees.
Q. If the health insurance offered by my employer does not cover all of the medical expenses related to my disability, does the company have to obtain additional coverage for me?
A. No. The ADA only requires that an employer provide employees with disabilities equal access to whatever health insurance coverage is offered to other employees.
Q. I think I was discriminated against because my wife is disabled. Can I file a charge with the EEOC?
A. Yes. The ADA makes it unlawful to discriminate against an individual, whether disabled or not, because of a relationship or association with an individual with a known disability.
Q. Are people with AIDS covered by the ADA?
A. Yes. The legislative history indicates that Congress intended the ADA to protect persons with AIDS and HIV disease from discrimination.

For more specific information about ADA requirements affecting employment contact:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
P.O. Box 7033
Lawrence, Kansas 66044
(800) 669-4000 (Voice), (800) 669-6820 (TDD)
For more specific information about ADA requirements affecting public accommodations and State and local government services contact:
Department of Justice
Office on the Americans with Disabilities Act
Civil Rights Division
P.O. Box 66118
Washington, DC 20035-6118
(202) 514-0301 (Voice)
(202) 514-0381 (TDD)
(202) 514-0383 (TDD)
For more specific information about requirements for accessible design in new construction and alterations contact:
Architectural and Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board

1111 18th Street, NW
Suite 501
Washington, DC 20036
800-USA-ABLE
800-USA-ABLE (TDD)
For more specific information about ADA requirements affecting transportation contact:
Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590
(202) 366-9305
(202) 755-7687 (TDD)
For more specific information about ADA requirements for telecommunications contact: Federal Communications Commission 1919 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20554 (202) 634-1837 (202) 632-1836 (TDD)

You may obtain this booklet in alternate formats, upon request by dialing 800-669-3362 or 800-800-3302.

This page was last modified on March 21, 2005.
http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/ada18.html